Hello and welcome to the results of my reader poll.

I did wonder if it was a stupid idea to send out a poll on the political views of my readers, particularly given I did so only a couple of weeks after proudly declaring that one of my New Yearā€™s Resolutions would be to pay less attention to politics. However, it seemed like a good idea at the time, and I probably did it in some kind of response to the fact that here in the UK we were legally leaving the European Union, which felt like an historic and important moment for the country. And for me.

Nonetheless ā€“ to all those who pointed out to me that it was a stupid thing to do ā€“ youā€™re probably right.

That said, it has answered a fundamental question which ā€“ on the day I set the poll at least ā€“ I was curious about. Even if I donā€™t know what Iā€™m going to do with the information now. The results to the poll should show up below here, and you can see at a glance one big finding ā€“ the readers of this newsletter are significantly more left/progressive/anti-Trump & Brexit (Iā€™m not sure which term is least judgmental) than you would see if this was just a sample of the general populations of the UK and US.

At the same time a small but significant proportion of readers do take the opposing view, and support Trump and Brexit (with Brexit being more supported of the two). And some, but not very many, donā€™t feel strongly either way.

Or at least, that was what I saw at first. But after I thought about it I realised a problem. It is an entirely self-selecting survey, so itā€™s possibly, actually likely, that those people who feel strongly on the matter were more likely to vote than those who arenā€™t bothered. This would decrease the number of not-bothered responses, and boost the number of anti and pro Trump/Brexit responses. So thereā€™s two things we cannot have much faith in. One ā€“ the proportion of people who donā€™t feel strongly either way, and two, my ability to set a scientifically rigorous poll.

Weā€™re on slightly safer ground with the first finding though. Of those who are bothered, most are against Trump & Brexit. Which is interesting. I didnā€™t really say, but this does match my views on the matter. Perhaps my views comes through in my writing and strikes a chord. Perhaps itā€™s a reflection that people who read more tend to have those views in the first place? I donā€™t know, but itā€™s interesting.

I realised a couple of other things as I read through the responses, which Iā€™ll briefly outline here.

I failed to appreciate when I wrote the poll, how Britain and the United States are in a slightly different position regarding these issues. Here in the UK, we were at the point of legally leaving the EU ā€“ and for many people who were against that, it was a moment of shrugging their shoulders and accepting it, for better or worse. There was a kind of reflective mood. But over in America the battle was literally at a crescendo with the decision to impeach or not impeach Trump happening at that very time. Hardly surprising, in retrospect, that emotions there were much rawer than here in the UK. (And those readers who questioned my sanity on even asking the question were mostly from the US, suggesting it felt a less stupid thing to do to UK readers).

This difference will grow as the US election ā€“ and the sense of Americaā€™s destiny hanging in the balance ā€“ gets closer throughout the year, while little old Britain potters along on our new course, with no one able to change it. The only exception to this is the situation with Scotland, where anger and tension does seem to be continuing to grow rather than dissipate.

I guess another difference is that Trumpism is a blend of what his government does or tries to do, and the man personally. And while as an individual it’s hard to build a supportive case for him – we’ve all seen him lying (on releasing his tax returns, on whether he knew of the payments to Stormy Daniels, on countless other matters) – it’s still possible to support what he’s trying to do. With Brexit the personalities on both sides can be pretty off-putting, and there is no one individual that defines Brexit in the same way (Though several – Nigel Farage, Boris Johnson – would probably claim they do.)

However, through the comments left on the website, and also through emails from some readers, I did get a new perspective on why some people actually support Trump or Brexit. I confess to being pretty well insulated in a liberal middle-class bubble, so that most of the people I speak to have the same views as me. This means my biggest exposure to the other side of the arguments comes from TV and radio. And while Iā€™ve suspected for some time that the media tends to seek out the simplest and most extreme explanations and characterisations of leave voters or Trump supporters, the responses to the poll seem to support this.

It was interesting therefore to read so many considered, articulate and persuasive arguments for why leaving the EU, or supporting Trump might be a good thing, (notwithstanding that Trump as an individual is pretty unpleasant and graceless. For example a reader from Denmark explained to me how her reason for opposing the EU from its very inception, because it came with a built in power-inequality. SeƱora Gonzalez from Spain could never speak directly with Frau Schmidt or Fru Jensen ā€“because of the language barrier. Meanwhile the political elite use the money raised from taxing all three of them to translate everything, so that they donā€™t face the same barrier. Iā€™m not saying I fully buy this as a reason to leave, but it was a point of view I hadnā€™t ever heard expressed in three full years of arguing on TV.

Another lady urged me to take some time to watch Fox News to see whatā€™s a difference Trump was really making ā€“ and when I asked her for actual examples of the difference, thinking she wouldnā€™t be able to, she did reel off a list of concrete examples, the strength of the economy, the opposition to illegal immigration, the rise in employment. And while I probably could come back with counter arguments, I had to admit that the media I watch/read (mostly the BBC/Channel 4 news and the Guardian) doesnā€™t exactly highlight these issues in a positive light. And perhaps not even a fair light. My next reaction was to urge her to spend more time watching the news I watch, but then I thought ā€“ I don’t know what the economy is really doing, I don’t know what employment figures are. How do I know Iā€™m right and sheā€™s wrong?

Thereā€™s other examples, but you can see them below in the comments so I wonā€™t go through them here.

Iā€™m also not saying Iā€™m sold and Iā€™ve changed my views. I thought, on balance, that both Brexit and Trump were the wrong choices before I did this poll, and I still think that. But perhaps the balance has shifted (a bit). Itā€™s interesting how simply engaging on a one-to-one basis with people who are considered and thoughtful and not angry about these issues, helps to show them from other perspectives. I think and hope Iā€™ve become more open-minded as a result of the whole exercise.

But even so, I still agree with those who emailed me to tell me it was a stupid thing to do! It also wasnā€™t ā€˜researchā€™ – I don’t have any serious plans to write a political thriller at this point (I did actually try once, a couple of years back, and I got to 60,000 words before I realised it was the worst thing Iā€™d even written.) Maybe one day, but for now, the whole thing is probably best written off as a relapse on a New Year’s Resolution, and Iā€™ll try harder in future.

Results below. Now Iā€™m off to get on with some real workā€¦

[yop_poll id=”4″]

Pop your email below...

Ā 

And check your inbox for your free copy of Killing Kind!

Success! Now check your inbox.